MINUTES
GREEN BAY
HOUSING AUTHORITY
Thursday,
November 15, 2007
1424 Admiral
Court, Second Floor Reading Room
Green Bay,
WI 54303
10:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: W. Van Ess, Chair; A. Nicholson; H. Genunzio
MEMBERS EXCUSED: D.
Dolan-Wallace; W. VandeCastle
OTHERS PRESENT: Keith Pamperin, Rob Strong, Anne Monday,
Noel Halvorsen, D. Dewitt, G. Hetrick, J. Fonder, A. Haefs, R. Huven
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A motion was made by A.
Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to approve the minutes of the October
18, 2007 regular meeting of the Green Bay Housing Authority.
COMMUNICATIONS:
1. November 1, 2007 letter from William J. Munz, representing West Shore Green Bay, LLC requesting the GBHA re-issue the tax-exempt bonds that finance Rivers Edge Apartments.
K. Pamperin presented the communication. He stated the re-issuing of the tax-exempt bonds would be taken up with a later item.
OLD BUSINESS:
2.
Review of options
presented for the sale or transition of GBHA Scattered Sites and leveraging
financing for Mason Manor Retirement Community and appointing a Subcommittee of
commissioners and staff to make recommendations to the Authority.
K. Pamperin presented the
item. He stated that at last month’s
meeting the consultant had provided a presentation of options. He went over the five primary options but
stated there are additional options in regard to financing.
K. Pamperin stated that the
consultant did a site visit to Mason Manor on November 8. He stated Mason Manor could be used as a tax
credit investment essentially having the Housing Authority remain as owner and
administrator but partnering with a private investor to purchase tax credits.
He stated the consultant, Dimension Development LLC, was hired to look at
options for the sale or transition of Scattered Sites and to determine how the
Authority could leverage financing to fund the elevator-storage addition at
Mason Manor. He stated to meet the 2008
application deadline for tax credits, partner agreements would need to be
formulated and an application prepared and submitted to WHEDA by February 28,
2008.
K. Pamperin asked if the
Authority would like to discuss the options today or if a Subcommittee of the
Authority should be formed consisting of Authority members and staff.
N. Halvorsen, Executive
Director of NeighborWorks, presented a letter asking that the Authority
consider their possible involvement in regard to the Scattered Site
properties.
After further discussion, a
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to form a
Subcommittee of the Authority to look at the options presented by the
consultant. The Subcommittee would
consist of D. Dolan-Wallace and W. VandeCastle as Authority members and R.
Strong, K. Pamperin and A. Monday as staff.
The Subcommittee will meet in
the near future and report back to the Authority.
3.
Report and action on
proposals for replacement of the Mason Manor Security Surveillance Camera
system.
K. Pamperin stated the contractor, A & A Fire and Security, originally installed the present system and had submitted an estimate for replacement indicating that all of the equipment and wiring had been destroyed by the lightning strike and indicated the cost to replace equipment, not including labor or wiring, is estimated to be $17,000. It is A & A Fire and Security’s belief that all of the wiring is likely going to need to be replaced as well. K. Pamperin feels we need competitive proposals for replacing the system.
K. Pamperin stated he was
referred to Heartland Business Systems of Little Chute and Milwaukee, a firm
that has experience in designing and estimating such surveillance camera
systems. A representative of Heartland Systems has visited Mason Manor and they
are willing to test the existing systems and provide specifications for
replacement with several alternative options including down sizing and
expanding the system. He stated following consultation with the on-site staff,
there is concern if the system is used adequately to justify replacement. The
primary issue for on-site staff is monitoring the three entrances (first floor,
second floor and community room).
K. Pamperin stated he had
received a verbal quote not to exceed $2000. From Heartland Systems to put
together specifications for replacement of the existing equipment with
alternates for expansion to include the Community Room entrance and the
resident and visitor parking lots to the north. This would include testing the wiring to determine if it needs to
be replaced.
A motion was made by A.
Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to enter into a contract with
Heartland Security to prepare specifications for replacement and/or expansion
of the security system at Mason Manor at a cost not to exceed $ 2000.
NEW BUSINESS:
4.
Resolution No 07-05, a Resolution Authorizing and Providing for the Sale
and Issuance of Refunding Revenue Bonds to Refinance the River’s Edge
Apartments Project, and Certain Related Details.
K.
Pamperin presented the item.
A.
Nicholson asked what would happen if we did not re-issue the bonds.
K.
Pamperin stated the current bonds would continue until they run out, or the
owner could refinance with bonds issued by WHEDA or other entities.
A
motion was made by H. Genunzio, seconded by A. Nicholson and carried to adopt
Resolution No. 07-05.
5.
Review of request and authorization to make payment for Law Department
Services.
K.
Pamperin presented a letter from the Law Department. He stated this would be a one-time payment of $10,000 for one
year.
A
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to
authorize a one-time $10,000 payment for Law Department Services for one year.
6.
Authorization to proceed with replacement of damaged steps and railing at
1440 University Avenue, authorization to replace smoke/carbon dioxide detectors,
as needed, authorization to replace damaged storm doors and windows, and
authorization to do tuck-pointing.
K.
Pamperin presented the item stating these were needs determined by a recent
inspection in preparation for a HUD REAC inspection scheduled for November 28,
2007.
A
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to adopt
the item as presented.
7.
Authorization to replace vinyl window blinds at 1428 Dousman Street that
have been found to have lead content.
K.
Pamperin presented the item.
A
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to
authorize the replacement of blinds as presented.
8.
Authorization to contract for GBHA Scattered Site fall and spring gutter
cleaning.
K.
Pamperin presented the He stated
maintenance staff was left go because ICS could not continue to keep staff on
at the current contract fee. K.
Pamperin presented two proposals for the services.
A
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to
authorize the contracting for fall and spring gutter cleaning to the low
qualified bidder. .
9.
Review and
action on request of ICS to increase management fees for GBHA Scattered Site
Properties.
K.
Pamperin distributed and reviewed the November 13 letter submitted by ICS
offering two proposals for extending the existing Authority Scattered Site
Property Management Contract until March 31, 2008.
He stated Proposal
#1 continues the monthly management fee from $7058.69 per month and requires
the Authority to assume all maintenance and physical oversight, with ICS
providing all administrative services necessary to maintain occupancy, rent
collection, leasing, tenant issues, evictions, establishment of rent
certification, enforcement of rules and managing the 24 hour help line,
tenant/house assessments and all marketing activities. Repairs, maintenance
including emergency maintenance, unit turn over/apartment preparation, snow
removal, lawn mowing and trimming, and gutter cleaning would be the responsibility
of the Authority.
Proposal
#2 has ICS continuing to provide comprehensive administrative and physical
services as they do now under the current agreement at a new rate not to exceed
$9,700 per month.
K Pamperin stated
that the Authority does not have the staff or set up to provide the physical
repairs, maintenance, emergency maintenance, unit turn over/apartment
preparation, snow removal, lawn mowing and trimming, and gutter cleaning, that
would be the responsibility of the Authority, and it would take nearly three
months to put staff and/or contracted services and procedures in place.
His
recommendation would be to accept Proposal # 2 and use the three months to
determine what the Authority wants to do with the Scattered Site properties,
including the various options outlined which could include selling them as a
group, converting them from Public Housing to project based vouchers and
employing a conventional property manager, or retaining the Public Housing
annual contributions contract with HUD and leveraging those federal dollars to
create a revolving process of selling the existing single family units for home
ownership and using the proceeds along with replacement housing grants from HUD
to acquire and rehabilitate a replacement unit.
A.
Nicholson asked what the alternatives would be to ICS managing the properties.
K.
Pamperin stated a Request for Proposals was sent out a year ago and ICS was the
only contractor to respond. He stated they could not find a local private
property manager that was willing to take on the complexities of managing
public housing which includes such issues as stringent tenant certification,
requiring and administering community service requirements and the myriad of
HUD monitoring and reporting required to meet Public Housing Management
Assessment (PHAS) requirements with a very specific low income family
population.
He
stated staff has explored taking the management in-house but estimates are the
added staff required would exceed current costs. He stated although the current
process of privatizing government services has served the authority well for
the past nineteen years, we now find we are in a position that we cannot find
one vendor that has the capacity to provide all of the services required. He stated that he feels the most efficient
proposal would be to continue with ICS to give time to solicit alternate
management proposals.
R.
Strong stated this would be on a month-to-month basis and the fees can be
reevaluated in two to three months.
A.
Nicholson stated he wanted the Housing Authority to put out another Request for
Proposals for management of the sites.
A
motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to direct
staff to prepare a Request for Proposals for the Scattered Site Management.
A
motion was made by H. Genunzio, seconded by W. Van Ess and carried to continue
to contract with ICS, under Proposal #2 for the Scattered Site properties on a
month-to-month basis.
A.
Nicholson voted no.
10.
Report on HUD REACC Inspections scheduled for November 26th
and 27th 2007.
K. Pamperin presented the item as information.
11. Review and approval of the bid submitted by Schenick,
SC, Green Bay, as low qualified bid for annual independent audit services for
the Green Bay Housing Authority for two twelve month periods ending June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2009.
A motion was made by A.
Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to accept the low bidder.
K. Pamperin advised the
Authority that we have the opportunity to submit another FEMA, Fire Prevention
Safety Grant to install a Fire Suppression Sprinkler System at Mason Manor, and
he will prepare the grant application with the same matching requirements
submitted previously to meet the December 28th grant deadline. There
was no objection to submitting the grant application.
FINANCIAL REPORT AND
BILLS:
A motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to place the financial report on file and to authorize the payment of the bills as presented.
OCCUPANCY AND STAFF
REPORT:
A. Monday stated Mason Manor has four vacancies. D. Dewitt reported that Scattered Sites has one vacancy and is in the process of two evictions.
There being no further business to come before the Authority, a motion was made by A. Nicholson, seconded by H. Genunzio and carried to adjourn the meeting at 11:15 AM.